Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Tracking Weight Loss with the bodybuggSP
It took me a while to make this decision due to two factors.
Factor 1: Cost
Honestly I didn't want to spend this much money, but after reading quite a bit of information and contemplating a Polar heart rate monitor I went with the bodybuggSPTM. I caught it on sale for a holiday special and so I paid $199 with free shipping (about a $50 savings). This new version (as opposed to version 3) will sync with my iPhone. That seemed to be the smartest thing for me because I wanted real time data but didn't want to have to wear a wristband. I like my own watch.
Factor 2: Calories in, calories out
It is absolutely true that weight loss in its simplest description boils down to calories in vs calories out. If you consume more calories than you burn and therefore walk around, or may I say sit around, in a calorie surplus you will surely gain weight. If you break even, you will maintain your weight. If you create a deficit, you should lose weight. Sounds simple, right? Sure, if scale weight is your only concern. Most of you who read this blog know that I believe there is a lot more to it than that. I believe in changing your body composition (lean mass/body fat) rather than just focusing on scale weight. That's a blog post for another day, but I want to be clear that I'm not dissing the importance of getting excess body weight off, but I'm also not shifting from my stance that losing body fat is more important than losing body weight as the end goal.
Side bar (because I must): your weight on the scale is ONE piece of the picture. Scale weight can fluctuate wildly within a 24 hour period of time and is impacted by what you eat, your bowel habits, fluid intake or loss, hormones, menstrual cycle, etc. Don't use it as your sole measurement of success.
Back to this post. So I'm sure you're thinking, okay brainiac, then why did you spend that kind of money on something to help you track calories?
Two reasons.
Reason 1: Need for data
I have hypothyroidism and while I've yet to prove it I feel certain my basal metabolic rate is as slow as a snail. It's a challenge to figure out my optimal calorie range. Standard calculations do not seem to work for me. If I eat too little food or carbs, or if I don't time my food right I bonk during intense workouts and take longer to recover. If I eat the typical recommended amount of food or carbs, my weight will not come off and stay off. I seem to have to work harder than the average Jane in order to see the same type of results. Mind you I am not complaining, I just want more data to understand what is going on with my body. This is one way to get as much real data as possible. It's a fine line and I am trying to hit it just right. Somewhere between killing myself to get lean and mean and relaxing a little and getting soft and pudgy. Sigh. So don't think I don't understand your struggles. It's a journey for all of us.
Reason 2: Need for consistency
I'm a tracker. When I track things I do well, when I don't track things I slide off course. As much as I would like to be an intuitive, free spirit eater, the need for constant feedback, data, organization and consistency is woven into my genetic make-up. I teach people how to think on their feet, make good food choices when faced with bad ones and how to be prepared to gracefully handle the most unexpected sabotage. This works for me as well, but until I can fully grasp what my body requires I need data. It keeps me consistent and holds me accountable.
More to come on the bodybuggSPTM.
If you use a bodybuggSPTM, leave a comment with your thoughts!
Links in this article are to provide the reader with additional information about the.bodybuggSPTM. I purchased this product without prompting with my own funds and do not receive any compensation for the purchase of this product through a link.
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Exercise Not Helpful for Losing Weight?
Let's just step back and think about that for a minute. It is true that weight can be lost without exercise; I've talked about it before in this blog. I'm living proof of that, because I've done it before. Years ago I altered my eating such that the scales went down, I lost weight, and I didn't even do a leg raise in the process. It can be done. What was the result? I was ugly-skinny, still flabby and predominantly fat, I was sick several times, didn't have a lot of energy, wasn't strong, and had friends telling me to please eat something. I was down to one meal a day and hit a plateau before I reached my ultimate "number on the scale" weight. Once I started eating more food because I was hungry and deprived, I gained some weight back. Then felt like a failure. When I tried it again my body simply said NO.
Let me also clarify that I did not have an eating disorder. I simply was trying to get to a size I wanted to wear and the number on the scales to a number I thought was right for me, like so many other people I know. And to be honest for my height and bone structure the numbers were not outrageous. I'd been there before in my late teens early twenties.
I now have hypothyroidism, which I really don't dwell on, although I can tell you that I have to work harder and smarter than some folks I know to achieve similar results. I can't help but wonder if those days of slowing my metabolism down to a crawl through inadequate food intake and lack of exercise didn't jumpstart the problem.
Okay, back to the exercise component. Who actually thinks that exercise doesn't help? I'd like to hear from you. There are so many benefits that exercise provides for health and weight loss that I can't even list them all here. So I want to point out a couple of things, then I'm going to point you to an article that addresses it well.
First, you cannot out-exercise a crappy diet.
If you're ready to hang up your exercise hat because you're not seeing results, you need to evaluate your eating habits. Whether or not various types of exercise increase or decrease your appetite you have to be giving your body clean fuel in appropriate amounts. If you're working hard at the gym and canceling it out with a burger and fries on the way home, exercise is not the problem.
Second, trying to cut your calories low enough to enable you to sit around and not exercise totally backfires.
Let's say you cut back your calories from what you're currently eating now without changing your exercise level. Chances are your scale weight will drop. But once things even out again (now you're eating enough calories to maintain your new weight), you need to drop your food intake even more, if your goal is to still lose weight while sitting on the couch. Next thing you know, you're down to a tiny amount of food and you can't possibly cut the calories any more. Now you're skinny fat and you still don't feel like getting up off the couch because you have no fuel, no muscle and not enough energy.
If I continue I'll just go into a rambling rant, so I'd like for you to read a well written rebuttal to the Time Magazine article by Tom Venuto. Tom is a lifetime natural bodybuilder, nutritionist, personal trainer, and author of Burn the Fat, Feed the Muscle and The Body Fat Solution. You can read his response by clicking here.
Please understand that healthy living is challenging in today's world but it doesn't have to be complicated. Deliberate exercise and daily activity goes hand in hand with healthy eating, adequate sleep, stress reduction and illness prevention. If you are overwhelmed at the thought and you don't know where to start, let me know and I'd be happy to help point you in the right direction. getfitwithkelley@gmail.com
I have one of Tom Venuto's books in my Amazon Store. Please see my disclosure statement.